This
Lent, prayer and reflection can both hearten those already campaigning on behalf of the
poorest in society and open the eyes of those who are unaware of injustices such
as PIP reforms, says Virginia Moffatt …
Four years ago, a group of
disabled campaigners produced a ground breaking report – ‘Responsible Reform’,
also known as ‘The Spartacus Report’ (http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/files/response_to_proposed_dla_reforms.pdf). The
Spartacus Report took one aspect of the coalition government’s welfare reforms
– moving from Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to Personal Independent
Payments (PIP)– and demonstrated in painstaking detail, why it would be so
devastating for sick and disabled people. Thanks to a creative social media
campaign, the report went viral after it was published on the Ekklesia website,
with a retweet by Stephen Fry resulting in so many downloads, that the site
crashed.
At the time, the majority
of commentators and politicians had dismissed welfare as an issue of little importance.
Thanks in no small part to negative media headlines and tough talking from some
MPs the general mindset was that benefit claimants were scroungers and
cheats. Labour were so nervous of
challenging this rhetoric, that the coalition government’s Welfare Bill was receiving
little opposition, and campaigners were struggling to be heard. Spartacus
changed all that. Though the government
pushed through its reforms despite honourable opposition from the House of Lords,
Spartacus helped change the political discourse – today, no-one would consider
welfare a non-issue.
In the four years since
we’ve seen why. The Welfare Reform Act of 2012 and its successor of 2016, have
brought in a series of changes that have hit the poorest in society. The Work
Capability Assessment and sanctions regime so brutally exposed in the film,
‘I,Daniel Blake’ continue to do untold harm to people up and down the country.
Since the film was made,
PIP reforms have added to sick and disabled people’s misery. As the Spartacus
Report pointed out, DLA was developed by John Major’s government as a benefit
for all sick and disabled people in recognition of the costs of living with a
disability. Like child benefit, it was given to everyone regardless of income
(indeed David Cameron, the former Prime Minister, claimed it for his son Ivo).
Removing it would mean many working people being unable to pay for the
assistance they needed to dress, wash, use their motability car, and as a
result, many would lose their jobs. All of this has come to pass, and though
the change was supposed to save the government money, it has actually cost more
(http://www.centreforwelfarereform.org/library/by-az/impact-of-pip-on-social-care.html
).
Meanwhile, another
government ‘reform’ – universal credit – has been rolled out despite warnings
that the system doesn’t work and benefit recipients whether they are in work or
not will suffer. (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/universal-credit-debt-claimants-benefit-system-government-pilot-flaws-southwark-croydon-dwp-report-a8015476.html).
If anything, the bleak picture of an uncaring benefits system portrayed in Ken
Loach’s 2016 film is even worse today.
And yet, because of the
campaigns led by sick and disabled people, today, they now have many supporters
in the media and among opposition MPs. Last week as Laura Pidcock, MP led a debate on
PIP in the House of Commons, many commentators were aghast by the fact that some
Conservative MPs laughed and jeered. When disabled activists Paula Peters and
Keith Walker confronted minister Sarah Newton
afterwards, she was quick to walk away, though not before promising she
would sit down and talk to them: https://www.disabilitynewsservice.com/activists-explain-why-they-clashed-with-minister-after-pip-debate/.
Newton’s response to the
activists is all too familiar from Conservative politicians, many of whom are
so far removed from the everyday experiences of benefit recipients that they
seem unable to comprehend what their legislation is doing to people. Which
makes it all the more urgent for those of us who do know, to stand alongside
campaigners and raise our voices too. Because as Laura Pidcock said in the
debate last week (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlrHqU9tffQ), if we don’t,
history will not judge us kindly.
Nonetheless,
this is a long hard struggle and it is hard sometimes to keep going. So
yesterday, I was glad of the readings in church which could have been written
for anyone trying to work for justice. Job speaks for many of us at the times
when things seem bleak. 'Swifter than a weaver's shuttle my days have passed,
and vanished, leaving no hope behind.' Which is why we need the
Psalmist to remind us:
Yahweh sustains the poor, and humbles the wicked to the ground.'
Paul
then reminds us that preaching the good news is a responsibility which has
been put into our hands, and Jesus of the importance of prayer to sustain us.
Next
week, sees the beginning of Lent with many of you embarking on the Lent
course I have written based around the film I, Daniel Blake. While much of the
focus of the course is around two specific aspects of welfare 'reform' (the
work capability assessment and benefit sanctions), PIP and universal credit are
also highlighted, and wider issues of oppression are discussed. It is my hope
that a combination of reflection and prayer will both hearten those already
campaigning about welfare 'reform' and open the eyes of those who are unaware.
And in this way, together, we can add our voices to those of sick and disabled
people who have been calling for justice for far too long.
Virginia Moffatt is author of Nothing More and Nothing Less: A Lent Course based on the
film I, Daniel Blake, newly available for Lent 2018 in paperback. She contributed
to Simon Barrow’s Feast or Famine? How the gospel challenges austerity also newly
available for Lent 2018. Meanwhile, she was editor-in-chief of the key note
book at Greenbelt 2017, Reclaiming the Common Good: How Christians can help
re-build our broken world, available now in paperback.

No comments:
Post a Comment